Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite
More Like This: (Beta Temporary Feature)
User Comments:
Anonymous commented at 2016-03-25 09:36:56 » #1921246
Anon1, this cut was animated by a talented animator Kenji Kuroyanagi. Just because it's drawn differently, doesn't mean it's bad. Most animators have the freedom to express themeselves, not everything has to be on-model. Sometimes he sacrifices art for dynamic animation, it's just his style. You're probably one of those people who think Shinya Ohira or Naruto S. 167 is bad...
9 Points
Flag
Anon1, this cut was animated by a talented animator Kenji Kuroyanagi. Just because it's drawn differently, doesn't mean it's bad. Most animators have the freedom to express themeselves, not everything has to be on-model. Sometimes he sacrifices art for dynamic animation, it's just his style. You're probably one of those people who think Shinya Ohira or Naruto S. 167 is bad...
9 Points
Flag
Anonymous commented at 2016-03-25 15:39:03 » #1921436
Anon 2. Naruto S. 167 was bad. Yes, the fluidity was amazing and the idea was cool too but there was no focus. it was rediculous. The art was bad too. There's no reason why the quality of animation focus and choreography was so bad. why couldn't they have animated it like the Orochimaru vs Sasuke part 1. that had dynamic animation and great choreography. Not loony toon physics.
2 Points
Flag
Anon 2. Naruto S. 167 was bad. Yes, the fluidity was amazing and the idea was cool too but there was no focus. it was rediculous. The art was bad too. There's no reason why the quality of animation focus and choreography was so bad. why couldn't they have animated it like the Orochimaru vs Sasuke part 1. that had dynamic animation and great choreography. Not loony toon physics.
2 Points
Flag
Anonymous commented at 2016-03-25 19:48:30 » #1921550
My dear Anon#1,3
this is Anon 4 here.
Critiquing, is absolutely necessary to improve one's art, understanding and to develops ones preferences. The process is difficult but becomes even more so when the one who critiques uses non-specific terms. So allow me to critique your critique as a way to assist your understanding of your own words (as I feel you don't understand them either).
Anyone on the outside will likely see the word "bad" in your comment and say you didn't like how it was drawn, but no one, other than yourself, will have any idea as to why you think it's bad. You could be saying the lines are too ,or not, sharp as that interferes with the field of depth. You could be saying the bodies and facial expressions are so haphazardly drawn that characters seem deformed and their movement looks less realistic. You could also be saying that the artist is an overpaid charlatan and as a professional, someone like yourself (who are at least a year old),could do better.
From my point of view you are saying you don't like how artists experiment with different styles, and all of them should draw anime the same way, every time, effectively eliminating any sibilance of creativity, and professionally limiting themselves to a single venue .
Now your second comment. You used the word "bad" in describing art, animation and choreography so I can tell ... you didn't like it. but you praised it for its fluidity. When it comes to words used to show approval in body movement, the term fluid is highly used. It's often used to describe how one moves effortlessly from one movement to the next like water flowing in a stream. So unless you were referring to scene transitions or story continuity someone on the outside would assume you were referring to the body movement of the characters. The term "focus" can be used to interpret the center of action, the main purpose of a scene or story, whether or not something is clearly seen, as well as numerous other things. which means you either can't tell what's going on (story wise), things are happening all over the place (action wise) and you can't keep up, or you need glasses .
my point is be specific, if you know it than say it , if you don't then shut-up. Give me details, give me facts and don't give me bullshit about how you don't have the time. The moment you posted a comment on a porn website was the moment you told the world that you had the time.
15 Points
Flag
My dear Anon#1,3
this is Anon 4 here.
Critiquing, is absolutely necessary to improve one's art, understanding and to develops ones preferences. The process is difficult but becomes even more so when the one who critiques uses non-specific terms. So allow me to critique your critique as a way to assist your understanding of your own words (as I feel you don't understand them either).
Anyone on the outside will likely see the word "bad" in your comment and say you didn't like how it was drawn, but no one, other than yourself, will have any idea as to why you think it's bad. You could be saying the lines are too ,or not, sharp as that interferes with the field of depth. You could be saying the bodies and facial expressions are so haphazardly drawn that characters seem deformed and their movement looks less realistic. You could also be saying that the artist is an overpaid charlatan and as a professional, someone like yourself (who are at least a year old),could do better.
From my point of view you are saying you don't like how artists experiment with different styles, and all of them should draw anime the same way, every time, effectively eliminating any sibilance of creativity, and professionally limiting themselves to a single venue .
Now your second comment. You used the word "bad" in describing art, animation and choreography so I can tell ... you didn't like it. but you praised it for its fluidity. When it comes to words used to show approval in body movement, the term fluid is highly used. It's often used to describe how one moves effortlessly from one movement to the next like water flowing in a stream. So unless you were referring to scene transitions or story continuity someone on the outside would assume you were referring to the body movement of the characters. The term "focus" can be used to interpret the center of action, the main purpose of a scene or story, whether or not something is clearly seen, as well as numerous other things. which means you either can't tell what's going on (story wise), things are happening all over the place (action wise) and you can't keep up, or you need glasses .
my point is be specific, if you know it than say it , if you don't then shut-up. Give me details, give me facts and don't give me bullshit about how you don't have the time. The moment you posted a comment on a porn website was the moment you told the world that you had the time.
15 Points
Flag
1