Anonymous commented at 2014-10-16 23:52:34 » #1618948

This seems to be a lower res dupe of post #2435442

2 Points Flag

varet commented at 2014-11-01 13:53:07 » #1627254

Isn't this one (1280x1600) higher res than post #2435442 (960x1200)? And better tagged, too.

4 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2014-11-02 02:06:21 » #1627652

I forgot big images get resized. Derp.

#2435442 is the lower res dupe. (Technically not a dupe since it's the first image, but you get the idea.)

4 Points Flag