Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite
User Comments:
CoomGang69 commented at 2024-05-01 14:22:12 » #2886144
As it should. Mutilated dicks are not natural.
29 Points Flag
As it should. Mutilated dicks are not natural.
29 Points Flag
Name17 commented at 2024-05-06 06:07:51 » #2887140
I understand that people who have lost their foreskin cannot change this and feel that this is part of their identity so if someone points out something against that they feel attacked and the need to make up reasons for why that it's the best.
Having a foreskin is only bad if someone has atrocious hygene or if they have a specific issue.
On the other hand having one preserves the sensitivity of the glans and provides natural lubrication while also making the glans less abrasive and helps the immune system. There is also issues that can be avoided with a foreskin.
Forskin is also a natural part of mammals.
So it's not a disaster or anything if you don't have it but you shouldn't pretend like it's the best thing ever either and people should be given the choice instead of having that taken from them as babies.
12 Points Flag
I understand that people who have lost their foreskin cannot change this and feel that this is part of their identity so if someone points out something against that they feel attacked and the need to make up reasons for why that it's the best.
Having a foreskin is only bad if someone has atrocious hygene or if they have a specific issue.
On the other hand having one preserves the sensitivity of the glans and provides natural lubrication while also making the glans less abrasive and helps the immune system. There is also issues that can be avoided with a foreskin.
Forskin is also a natural part of mammals.
So it's not a disaster or anything if you don't have it but you shouldn't pretend like it's the best thing ever either and people should be given the choice instead of having that taken from them as babies.
12 Points Flag
1