Anonymous commented at 2009-10-28 22:59:32 » #140461

If it's a rule 34, then why no Rule 34 tag?

1 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2009-10-29 09:45:14 » #140743

Because then we'd have to tag all non-original material with the "Rule_34" tag, and we just don't have the patience.

9 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2009-10-29 10:48:48 » #140792

I'm tempted to give this a not_funny tag.

9 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2009-10-29 17:08:59 » #141010

As I understand it, Rule_34 tags usually only go with images that you don't acually see that often, but aren't so strange that they end up in What?.
As I understand it. I've been known to be wrong.

5 Points Flag

BlankBoard commented at 2009-11-20 11:15:43 » #157734

there you go rule 34 tag!^^

1 Points Flag

Tsukuyomi-no-Mikoto commented at 2009-11-25 22:24:12 » #161760

@anon3 there is now a not_funny tag

2 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2009-11-28 22:40:57 » #163858

it looks like -8's work. the coloring is familiar.

2 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2010-05-26 10:52:09 » #313331

Also he's obsessed with Peach.

2 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2010-06-14 17:31:15 » #332950

rule 34 is a lie..it has an exception...if u can find that exception u get a cookie =3

0 Points Flag

whatever4096 commented at 2010-07-20 16:52:59 » #372053

If the exception you refer to is Rule 34. That exception is no longer an exception.

1 Points Flag