Anonymous commented at 2009-05-10 09:14:13 » #50213

I hate images like this.
Get a life

7 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2009-05-14 01:15:21 » #51422

i agree this shit sucks

now watch, all the fucking pedos are going to downvote this

6 Points Flag

Ziv commented at 2009-05-16 15:26:37 » #52171

This is not loli, this is not toddlercon. It's completely Safe for work. None of those tags apply to safe pictures.

12 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2009-05-17 10:12:22 » #52463

LOL! I'd love to see you watch this at work and hear the comments from your colleagues. You're really out of touch with reality.

12 Points Flag

Ziv commented at 2009-05-20 09:08:37 » #53359

I'm at a complete loss as to what is wrong with this picture. If you live in America, it's on par with the content of half the videos on America's Funnies Home Videos. Seriously. What is wrong with a picture of a baby in a diaper?

14 Points Flag

Ziv commented at 2009-05-20 09:11:33 » #53360

So I suppose, to respond to your hypothetical scenario, my colleagues would probably say "That's cute. Now get back to work"

8 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2009-05-20 16:20:46 » #53485

No, they'd say "Umm, why are you looking at pictures of half-naked babies?"

9 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2009-05-20 22:29:36 » #53663

Dude seriously. Go find a package of Pampers and look at what's on the cover.

12 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2009-05-21 17:23:09 » #53873

That's marketing. It shows the product in action. So that's justified. However, specifically looking up pictures of naked babies on the internet, drawn or not, will get people to consider you a creep.

8 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2009-07-16 18:38:14 » #77707

Hmm... I think this "Internet" thing was a bad idea.

7 Points Flag