Chargin_Chuck commented at 2017-10-06 14:13:14 » #2173204

Please stop tagging furry/anthro as personification.

0 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2017-10-06 15:17:27 » #2173222

please stop using the anthro tag, just use the furry tag. also, the personification tag is correct in this case because these pokemon are not canonically anthropomorphic; the personification tag is for when a non-human or non-humaniod character is drawn as human or humanoid.

0 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2017-10-08 02:21:56 » #2173605

no_humans and personification tag are mutually exclusive

0 Points Flag

Chargin_Chuck commented at 2017-10-08 02:26:38 » #2173607

I don't care, as long as its tagged with something I can blacklist so I don't see furry art.

0 Points Flag

AngryZapdos commented at 2017-10-22 05:46:35 » #2177300

Furry tag only counts if the character has fur. If you want to remove non-human stuff then blacklist the tag "no_humans".

0 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2017-10-22 09:38:08 » #2177325

wrong, per the tag definition, having fur has nothing to do with the furry tag; it is for any anthropomorphic animal.

gelbooru.com/index.php?page=wiki&s=view&id=595

0 Points Flag

AngryZapdos commented at 2017-10-22 12:27:36 » #2177351

I actually came back here just to correct myself; I was thinking of two tags at once by accident. No, it doesn't need to have fur to be considered furry on Gelbooru.

1 Points Flag