Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite
User Comments:
Anonymous commented at 2016-08-16 09:27:15 » #2004232
Anon 1 is technically correct guys.
The one that got deleted was uploaded 2016-07-07 06:28:43
And this one was uploaded 2016-07-09 20:30:39
So why is it this one stayed despite coming after the one that got deleted? I can only guess because of site bias because Danbooru uploaded this one.
1 Points Flag
Anon 1 is technically correct guys.
The one that got deleted was uploaded 2016-07-07 06:28:43
And this one was uploaded 2016-07-09 20:30:39
So why is it this one stayed despite coming after the one that got deleted? I can only guess because of site bias because Danbooru uploaded this one.
1 Points Flag
Jerl commented at 2016-08-16 11:16:28 » #2004263
This one is the actual original file that the artist posted on Pixiv (verified by matching the MD5's); the other one has been resaved as a JPEG. I don't really see any compression artifacts in the other version, but it has been resaved as a JPEG. Why settle for "well, I don't really see any JPEG compression artifacts..." when we could have "I know for a fact that this version has the fewest compression artifacts of any version that exists"?
1 Points Flag
This one is the actual original file that the artist posted on Pixiv (verified by matching the MD5's); the other one has been resaved as a JPEG. I don't really see any compression artifacts in the other version, but it has been resaved as a JPEG. Why settle for "well, I don't really see any JPEG compression artifacts..." when we could have "I know for a fact that this version has the fewest compression artifacts of any version that exists"?
1 Points Flag
1