Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite


More Like This: (Beta Temporary Feature)


User Comments:


Anonymous commented at 2015-11-05 18:28:24 » #1843802

Jessie was actually happy to see Wabafet there...

0 Points Flag
KarmikMkIII commented at 2015-11-17 02:50:12 » #1850193

Anon #1845760, if you took more than a 4 second look at Gelbooru's collection, you'll know that it's not all about "Questionable" and "Explicit"

5 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2015-11-22 07:38:05 » #1853099

#1853059

Sometimes you can want to see explicit images. Other times you can want to see safe fanart of things you like. Both reasons aren't mutually exclusive.

Anyone with two brain cells would understand by themselves, but I guess it's too hard for you...

4 Points Flag
Jerl commented at 2015-11-22 20:33:47 » #1853476

pffff, ha ha ha ha, omg Anon #1853052, and Xalrun for that matter, you mean you come to a website that has over 50,000 images of bestiality porn and over 100,000 images of tentacle rape to view "safe images"??


The current Gelbooru post counts are as follows:
Safe: 1669934 (61.26%)
Questionable: 483737 (17.74%)
Explicit: 572161 (20.99%)

We currently have 9162 posts tagged "bestiality" and 23649 tagged "tentacle". Of those post tagged "tentacle", only 7015 are tagged "rape". There are only 80 posts tagged "tentacle_rape".

In contrast, we have 23988 posts tagged "no_humans". We have more images without any humanoid characters at all than those involving tentacles.

These statistics were compiled from the Gelbooru API and are 100% accurate.

There are far more of those pretty paintings on the bathroom in Gelbooru than there are strippers. In fact, if your analogy is true, then Barnes & Noble is an adult/porno store, since they have an erotica section.

Me: "Why did you come to a website that has hundreds of thousands of sexually explicit images?


Because it has almost two million images that aren't explicit. That's an order of magnitude larger.

You're not fooling anyone, if you're here at a website that has millions (!) of explicit images your here to jerk of to them.


Nope. If you include questionable images, you get pretty close, but about half of those aren't really pornographic even if they're suggestive. Images rated explicit by themselves are only a bit more than halfway there.

Q.E.D.

8 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2015-11-23 04:36:09 » #1853685

I honestly don't understand how anyone could care so much about whether we call this place a porn site or not. It's got porn on it -- literally no one is disputing that. It also has safe images on it. That is a simple fact. Why all the fuss about what to label it?

5 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2015-11-23 18:34:48 » #1854028

Because it isn't a pornsite -- it is mainly an art site. I understand the argument though. People call it a pornsite because you can find porn on it. But, if a porn flick had one gay scene in it; should the pornflick then be considered a gay porno? Even if 95% of the movie is hetero?

3 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2015-11-23 18:47:19 » #1854037

...does anyone have anything to say about the image?

1 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2015-11-24 02:57:55 » #1854220

Lol proxy downvotes.

2 Points Flag