![](https://gelbooru.com/extras/store/728/72890-4.jpg)
![](https://img3.gelbooru.com//images/59/b7/59b7a456a9bc7ec6d86e1517868761e7.jpg)
Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite
User Comments:
Anonymous commented at 2010-12-18 00:42:12 » #549188
IT'S NOT A JET IT'S A J7W*1*! THE J7W*2* IS THE TURBOJET POWERED ONE, THE J7W1 IS RADIAL ENGINE POWERED JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER GODDAMN JAP FIGHTER EXCEPT THE KI-61!!!! ARE YOU TELLING ME THAT YOU CAN'T TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A PUSHER PROPELLER AND A GODDAMN TURBINE ENGINE? GO BACK TO FAPPING AT XBOORU YOU FAIL AT LIFE!!!!!
God, aren't *booru editors supposed to be obsessive about that sort of detail? You're letting me down people.
0 Points
Flag
IT'S NOT A JET IT'S A J7W*1*! THE J7W*2* IS THE TURBOJET POWERED ONE, THE J7W1 IS RADIAL ENGINE POWERED JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER GODDAMN JAP FIGHTER EXCEPT THE KI-61!!!! ARE YOU TELLING ME THAT YOU CAN'T TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A PUSHER PROPELLER AND A GODDAMN TURBINE ENGINE? GO BACK TO FAPPING AT XBOORU YOU FAIL AT LIFE!!!!!
God, aren't *booru editors supposed to be obsessive about that sort of detail? You're letting me down people.
Anonymous commented at 2011-12-24 00:24:21 » #958765
Anon1 - You forgot the Ki-64. Twin inline. Steam-cooled, too.
And the Ki-60, which was the heavy fighter proposal that went with the Ki-61 lighter fighter.
Plus the Ki-10, which was obsolete, but still a fighter.
Should I keep going so we can watch your head explode? :3
Ya wanna gripe about people getting their facts straight, make sure your's are all straight too.
2 Points
Flag
Anon1 - You forgot the Ki-64. Twin inline. Steam-cooled, too.
And the Ki-60, which was the heavy fighter proposal that went with the Ki-61 lighter fighter.
Plus the Ki-10, which was obsolete, but still a fighter.
Should I keep going so we can watch your head explode? :3
Ya wanna gripe about people getting their facts straight, make sure your's are all straight too.
1