Anonymous commented at 2013-12-13 06:13:58 » #1452410

Gelbooru isn't a dumping ground for your shitty memes.

7 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2013-12-13 13:27:23 » #1452558

The sad thing is, I can see this happening.

6 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2013-12-13 17:01:30 » #1452653

It's a Huckbein MKIII.

1 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2013-12-13 23:43:18 » #1452858

According to Sunrise, Hucks are Gundams, and had to be DESTROYED or else they'd bring out copyright infringement charges.

3 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2014-01-30 13:28:44 » #1479374

Anything with EX in the front should be burned to ashes along with bastards who killed original Huckies.

3 Points Flag

lawrence_elsa commented at 2014-02-22 20:04:17 » #1492472

I clicked the Super Robot Wars tag expecting to see other mecha designs, but ended up with about 50 pages of porn. The real question is: Why did I expect anything different on Gelbooru?

4 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2014-03-02 00:16:49 » #1496419

Try searching "super_robot_wars mecha"

This will filter out most of the porn and leave you with 7 pages of robots.

1 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2014-05-19 00:52:02 » #1537052

I hope that Banpresto manages to reach an agreement with Sunrise in regards to using the Hucks by the time the next OG game comes out, so that we can maybe see them in it. Most of their parts are now on ExExbein, but if the Z series is introduced, dimensional shenanigans could allow us to get another dimension's hucks.

0 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2014-11-10 18:46:34 » #1632846

There's no agreement to reach to be honest. Sunrise is owned by Bandai and Bandai bought out Banpresto even before the Hucks started being replaced. Notice how the PS2 remake of SRW OG1 and 2 still has all the Huckebein units.
To begin with the reason why there's any similarities is because the Huckebein units were designed by Hajime Katoki, one of the premier designers working for Bandai and one of the men responsible for the modern iconic Gundam look.

1 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2015-01-13 12:22:05 » #1669473

@anon 5: except thats 00 quan[t] and theres no "EX" in its name...

0 Points Flag