![](https://img3.gelbooru.com//images/91/f1/91f15a97c39bf6a0fc761cae3cc7cb5d.jpeg)
Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite | Pool Relationships
User Comments:
Lord_Garthaur commented at 2012-07-08 02:19:51 » #1111331
I believe it was a purposeful misspelling for comedic emphasis.
7 Points
Flag
I believe it was a purposeful misspelling for comedic emphasis.
Anonymous commented at 2012-07-08 11:04:46 » #1111587
How about we finish this discussion once and for all:
When looking for lolis, what is one looking for? Girls who look young, because one is likely planning on fapping to that.
If you add girls who are according to lore of loli age, but look nothing like it, they'd find things they weren't looking for, rendering the tag useless.
The same goes the other way round. If you omit certain loli-like beings just because they're supposed to be old even though they're clearly fappable by anyone who's looking for lolis, you're missing the point of tags to begin with.
So yeah, stop misusing loli tags.
21 Points
Flag
How about we finish this discussion once and for all:
When looking for lolis, what is one looking for? Girls who look young, because one is likely planning on fapping to that.
If you add girls who are according to lore of loli age, but look nothing like it, they'd find things they weren't looking for, rendering the tag useless.
The same goes the other way round. If you omit certain loli-like beings just because they're supposed to be old even though they're clearly fappable by anyone who's looking for lolis, you're missing the point of tags to begin with.
So yeah, stop misusing loli tags.
TheAmazingAzunyan commented at 2012-07-19 04:45:27 » #1119673
I forgot that loli nowadays is defined by age.
Oh wait, it isn't
13 Points
Flag
I forgot that loli nowadays is defined by age.
Oh wait, it isn't
1