Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite
More Like This: (Beta Temporary Feature)
User Comments:
crudebuster commented at 2011-09-11 12:09:31 » #874702
Ah, we have a prude here... "Body distension is out of the rules, boo hoo". Dont you worry, it's all in pixiv anyway. There are a hundred thousand pics you may want out of gelbooru, don't stop your watch! Idiot.
3 Points
Flag
Ah, we have a prude here... "Body distension is out of the rules, boo hoo". Dont you worry, it's all in pixiv anyway. There are a hundred thousand pics you may want out of gelbooru, don't stop your watch! Idiot.
3 Points
Flag
Anonymous commented at 2011-09-11 13:37:55 » #874769
Oh hey, another Anon. I'd forgotten that was possible.
Anyway, seconded. Also, do you (mods/admins) have a detailed/reasoned explanation of the operational definition of "guro" for Gelbooru? Sometimes, I agree with the apparent definition (post-headshot picture), and sometimes I see no intuitive link whatsoever. I mean, are y'all trying to say that stuff like this is elephantiasis porn, or something?
I'm honestly at a loss to come up with definitions, rationales, and aesthetics regarding the stated rules that wouldn't logically ban anything more feminine than a trap, but less feminine than a tomboy.
In plain English: by the definitions from the ToS, and my attempts to understand them, why is it guro if a woman has a large penis, but not if she has a penis, period? This isn't an argument to ban all futa, by no means, I'm just very confused.
4 Points
Flag
Oh hey, another Anon. I'd forgotten that was possible.
Anyway, seconded. Also, do you (mods/admins) have a detailed/reasoned explanation of the operational definition of "guro" for Gelbooru? Sometimes, I agree with the apparent definition (post-headshot picture), and sometimes I see no intuitive link whatsoever. I mean, are y'all trying to say that stuff like this is elephantiasis porn, or something?
I'm honestly at a loss to come up with definitions, rationales, and aesthetics regarding the stated rules that wouldn't logically ban anything more feminine than a trap, but less feminine than a tomboy.
In plain English: by the definitions from the ToS, and my attempts to understand them, why is it guro if a woman has a large penis, but not if she has a penis, period? This isn't an argument to ban all futa, by no means, I'm just very confused.
4 Points
Flag
Anonymous commented at 2011-09-11 13:58:19 » #874780
Ugh, further thoughts...
I have to put effort into thinking about what guro means to the mods and admins, because I can tell it means something different to them, than it does to me. I consider 'freakshow' stuff to be light guro, but if they also believed that, there'd be a mass deletion of the various "multiple_[body part]" tags. I won't link to example pictures, because some of them I can tell haven't been reviewed. (I ought to go flag them for having visible artifacts. Oh, well.) At the same time, stylistic trends basically force me to interpret proportional properties through the lens of "this is just what they wanted to emphasize/whatever".
Or should we report goddamn everything for the preposterously disproportional eyes?
4 Points
Flag
Ugh, further thoughts...
I have to put effort into thinking about what guro means to the mods and admins, because I can tell it means something different to them, than it does to me. I consider 'freakshow' stuff to be light guro, but if they also believed that, there'd be a mass deletion of the various "multiple_[body part]" tags. I won't link to example pictures, because some of them I can tell haven't been reviewed. (I ought to go flag them for having visible artifacts. Oh, well.) At the same time, stylistic trends basically force me to interpret proportional properties through the lens of "this is just what they wanted to emphasize/whatever".
Or should we report goddamn everything for the preposterously disproportional eyes?
4 Points
Flag
1 2