Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite
User Comments:
luffy11234 commented at 2011-02-06 10:41:29 » #610391
just because she looks cute he are not a lolicon. He is just saying his oppinion. <<
13 Points Flag
just because she looks cute he are not a lolicon. He is just saying his oppinion. <<
13 Points Flag
JohnSmith909-2 commented at 2011-09-28 15:26:30 » #888385
Anon 2: wrong. Look here- en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephebophilia
Saori too old to be a loli and the father would be an Ephebohile, not a pedo. Loli is prepubescent.
5 Points Flag
Anon 2: wrong. Look here- en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephebophilia
Saori too old to be a loli and the father would be an Ephebohile, not a pedo. Loli is prepubescent.
5 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2012-07-21 15:41:01 » #1121355
No, anon2. Saori is NOT a loli. age alone does not determine whether a girl is a loli. What defines a loli is a girl with a pre-pubescent body. AKA, no boobs, no defined sexual traits, just the body if an underage little girls. For example, the teacher in Index, who is(seemingly) an adult, has the body of an underage 11 year old. Therefore, she still qualifies as a loli despite her (proclaimed) age.
5 Points Flag
No, anon2. Saori is NOT a loli. age alone does not determine whether a girl is a loli. What defines a loli is a girl with a pre-pubescent body. AKA, no boobs, no defined sexual traits, just the body if an underage little girls. For example, the teacher in Index, who is(seemingly) an adult, has the body of an underage 11 year old. Therefore, she still qualifies as a loli despite her (proclaimed) age.
5 Points Flag
1