Now Viewing: Want an image restored?
Keep it civil, do not flame or bait other users. If you notice anything illegal or inappropriate being discussed, contact an administrator or moderator.
Quote
Posted on: 08/09/11 02:39PM
And even if they weren't. It took me some time to realize the reason for the double standard was more because the Mods didn't even said offending images even EXISTED... rather than them bullying others.
It makes sense if a mod is more likely to catch a NEW image violation and less likely to find an older one from three years ago.
It makes sense if a mod is more likely to catch a NEW image violation and less likely to find an older one from three years ago.
Posted on: 08/09/11 07:24PM
Especially since I pointed the new one out to them on IRC as soon as I saw it. Mods tend to act immediately on things when you shove them in their face; not so much if no one tells them about it.
Posted on: 08/09/11 07:48PM
ShadowbladeEdge said:
Anti_Gendou's picture
Anti_Gendou's picture
Something about that image makes me feel like its primary intention isn't to squick the viewer out. That's why I'm keeping it, anyway.
Posted on: 08/09/11 08:30PM
But you are killing a cute thing. I just had a guro image I uploaded get deleted recently. It wasn't so squickish though... but it was about a cute girl's death.
I'm not about to ask it restored though. There were a lot of comments on it arguing over whether said image was even guro or not so... I just dropped any desire to keep it anyway.
I'm not about to ask it restored though. There were a lot of comments on it arguing over whether said image was even guro or not so... I just dropped any desire to keep it anyway.
Posted on: 08/10/11 05:29AM
I can't speak for intent, but it just turned out a notch or two above a Saturday morning cartoon. It's the lack of pornographic detail I suppose.
Posted on: 08/10/11 08:53PM
was wondering why a image got removed.
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=1240871 got removed for being a dupe even though its higher quality then the one already on the site so if anything shouldn't it have been the other way around?
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=1240871 got removed for being a dupe even though its higher quality then the one already on the site so if anything shouldn't it have been the other way around?
Posted on: 08/10/11 09:12PM
Indeed; the one that got kept is smaller and poorly compressed, so yours should have been the one to stay.
Posted on: 08/10/11 09:22PM
Agreed, I also added the tags from the lesser quality image to his better version for when it is restored.
Posted on: 08/10/11 11:24PM
I deleted the wrong one ;_;
Posted on: 08/12/11 10:24AM
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=981341
Isn't "scat". If you actually applied physics there that tube for her shit isn't leading anywhere to her. That the other tube in her vag is to small to even consider such of a connection to the shit tube, and her gag is a rubber inflated ball.
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=981342
This one just backs up that same point even more. The insertion as to collect sperm. How the hell would a insertion like that collect her shit for "scat" is beyond me
Heck if you looked at the other pics/continuations of that it'd back it up even more Deus.
Isn't "scat". If you actually applied physics there that tube for her shit isn't leading anywhere to her. That the other tube in her vag is to small to even consider such of a connection to the shit tube, and her gag is a rubber inflated ball.
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=981342
This one just backs up that same point even more. The insertion as to collect sperm. How the hell would a insertion like that collect her shit for "scat" is beyond me
Heck if you looked at the other pics/continuations of that it'd back it up even more Deus.
Add Reply