Notice: My personal stance on AI generated artwork. Retweet and share if you agree. Let us discuss, and not immediately scream bloody murder.

Now Viewing: READ THIS FIRST! The (un)official Faq
Keep it civil, do not flame or bait other users. If you notice anything illegal or inappropriate being discussed, contact an administrator or moderator.

coyam - Group: Member - Total Posts: 9
user_avatar
Posted on: 10/25/23 01:20PM

Is this an error or is Gelbooru blocking the uploaded files?

gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=9155245



jedi1357 - Group: Moderator - Total Posts: 5724
user_avatar
Posted on: 10/25/23 01:31PM

coyam said:
Is this an error or is Gelbooru blocking the uploaded files?

gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=9155245


The image is 404. We still don't know what causes this.



coyam - Group: Member - Total Posts: 9
user_avatar
Posted on: 10/25/23 02:04PM

jedi1357 said:
coyam said:
Is this an error or is Gelbooru blocking the uploaded files?

gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=9155245


The image is 404. We still don't know what causes this.

So, there is no issue if I try to upload it again?



jedi1357 - Group: Moderator - Total Posts: 5724
user_avatar
Posted on: 10/25/23 02:23PM

coyam said:

So, there is no issue if I try to upload it again?


If it has the same MD5 hash our duplicate detector will keep you from uploading it.



coyam - Group: Member - Total Posts: 9
user_avatar
Posted on: 10/25/23 03:25PM

jedi1357 said:
coyam said:

So, there is no issue if I try to upload it again?


If it has the same MD5 hash our duplicate detector will keep you from uploading it.

There is a way to avoid this issue?



Floater - Group: Member - Total Posts: 310
user_avatar
Posted on: 10/25/23 08:12PM

coyam said:
jedi1357 said:
coyam said:

So, there is no issue if I try to upload it again?


If it has the same MD5 hash our duplicate detector will keep you from uploading it.

There is a way to avoid this issue?


I believe you can just re-save the png without any loss of quality.



coyam - Group: Member - Total Posts: 9
user_avatar
Posted on: 10/26/23 10:04AM

thanks



usagiaddict - Group: Member - Total Posts: 3
user_avatar
Posted on: 12/13/23 02:25PM

nozalf said:
forum #3545 Issues with webms/search bar? Instructions on how to fix. (Also if you're using an ad blocker)

Link doesn't work, I'm getting 302 Found and redirect to forum's index

Also, on semi-unrelated note, webms vp9 are no-go? I'm getting "Filetype not allowed. The admin is accepting complaints regarding this right now."
EDIT: since I've made post already and search is still borked: AV1 mp4s are off-limits as well?



faceoofevil - Group: Member - Total Posts: 1
user_avatar
Posted on: 12/15/23 12:33PM

Thank you for this! Really appreciate all the help and the links!



elfangor - Group: Member - Total Posts: 2
user_avatar
Posted on: 12/16/23 10:50PM

I have a handful of talking points.

First and most important to me:
Several months ago, I spent a frankly embarrassingly long time porting my rather large list of most commonly used tags on another site, including 'translating' certain tags that have a different name here.
Maybe a few weeks later, I was pretty devastated to find that my tag list was completely gone. Additionally, the "Display all site content" seems to keep unchecking itself periodically.
One possible caveat is that I exclusively browse in Private/Incognito mode, but I did a quick test recently and my Tag List & Display toggle persisted even after closing everything and logging in again.
I would appreciate any insight into this, as it is both frustrating and annoying.

Looking at the wiki page for tag group: breast tags (gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...s=&s=view&id=8314), there are a number of different styles among links on the page.
There are the default/unstyled links, but there are also links in bold, in italics, and with an asterisk (*) at the front. What is the significance of this?

On a similar note, regarding the subject of 'size' notation; is there a specific reason why the [[huge_breasts]] tag doesn't also Imply the [[large_breasts]] tag? I am not even saying that I necessarily dislike GB's system. In contrast, on e621 the breast size order goes [breasts] -> [big_breasts] -> [huge_breasts] -> [hyper_breasts], with each progressive step Implying all previous tags.
This makes it an "At Least" system of categorization rather than an "Exact" one. (The [flat_chest] and [small_breasts] tags are naturally excluded from this hierarchy.)
I find their system to be at least slightly superior (especially in flexibility), mainly for the reason that when performing a search, it is much simpler to add a negative search term than to fight against ungainly OR groupings.

Lurker no more! =D



add_replyAdd Reply


«747576777879808182 83 84